Comer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing denial of ineffective assistance claim for failure to challenge use “and/or” to connect multiple victims in aggravated assault instruction
• determining Comer’s appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue on appeal that the use of the “and/or” conjunctive in jury instructions for aggravated assault and resisting arrest were fundamental error
• “We find that the appropriate remedy is to order a new appellate proceeding to review [this issue], rather than ordering a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bryant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-26· cited 4×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-18· cited 2×
• Schepman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-19· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Pope v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-10-16· cited 230×
• Garzon v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-04-10· cited 74×
• Shabazz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-26· cited 8×
• James v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-06· cited 8×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-20· cited 7×
• Tindle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-27· cited 6×
• Collier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-16· cited 1×