Skip to main content

James v. People

Citations

  • 59 V.I. 866
  • 2013 WL 5509202
  • 2013 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Accordingly, the trial court’s rejection of the statement and subsequent curative instruction were sufficient to cure the inadmissible statement of the witness.”
  • “The purpose of closing argument is to mold the facts given during trial in the light most favorable to one’s client.”
  • “[T]he cardinal rule of closing argument [is] that counsel must confine comments to evidence in the record and to reasonable inferences from that evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Hodge, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.