James Stickley v. Karl Byrd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no Fourteenth Amendment violation of pretrial detainee when he was provided with only one roll of toilet paper per week
• finding under Fourteenth Amendment analysis, limiting access to toilet paper does not violate a clearly established right where inmate exhausted his supply of toilet paper before receiving his weekly allotment, particularly where plaintiff could shower
• finding ration policy of one roll of toilet paper per inmate per week not a constitutional violation only because the inmate had the opportunity to shower after a bowel movement when he ran out of paper for five days.
• finding denial of pretrial detainee’s requests for additional toilet paper did not violate constitution because of the limited amount of time he went'without toilet paper and because “[w]hen he did run’ out of toilet paper, he was able to clean himself by taking a shower”
• no constitutional deprivation where pretrial detainee exhausted his weekly allotment of toilet paper each week before week’s end
• no constitutional deprivation where pretrial detainee exhausted his weekly allotment of toilet paper each week before week’s end

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).