Wallace Beaulieu v. Cal Ludeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unclothed body searches of patients before they leave their facility’s secure perimeter did not violate the Fourth Amendment
• concluding that MSOP detainees could not assert a Fourth Amendment claim based on confiscation of prohibited television sets
• holding that the plaintiffs’ claims were moot because plaintiffs transferred out of the jail that allegedly violated their constitutional rights
• holding that prisoners’ claims for injunctive relief were moot because they were transferred out of the jail that allegedly violated their constitutional rights
• holding courts may consider availability of simple, safe, and less invasive techniques when determining if strip search was reasonable
• stating that a court “need reach the question of what process is due only if the inmates establish a constitutionally protected liberty interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).