James J. Moore v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an “abiding concern about the use by a trial judge of material derived from a [presentence report] is that it may contain false or unreliable information,” but noting that “this danger is somewhat alleviated” by disclosure requirement in Rule 32
• rejecting Government’s argument that “unsubstantiated” allegations “deserve little attention” because the district court made no findings that the defendant’s allegations were “frivolous”
• \[A] defendant should not be sentenced on the basis of information about him that is materially incorrect. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).