Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Indiana Supreme Court· 4/28/2015

James Bogner v. Teresa Bogner

Citations

  • 29 N.E.3d 733
  • 2015 Ind. LEXIS 354
  • 2015 WL 1944252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that father waived his right to appeal the summary nature of the child-support proceedings because the parties agreed to conduct the hearing in summary fashion and father never objected
  • noting that objections to the procedure used by the trial court not contemporaneously raised are waived on appeal
  • clarifying the proper standard on review for support modifications is clear error
  • acknowledging “the general principle that objections not contemporaneously raised are waived”
  • noting the \general principle that objections not contemporaneously raised are waived\
  • “These findings were sufficient to support the trial court’s conclusion that awarding the parenting time credit was not appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David, Rush, Dickson, Rucker, Massa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named James Bogner v. Teresa Bogner

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.