Skip to main content

Neese v. Kelley

Citations

  • 705 N.E.2d 1047
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 153
  • 1999 WL 72773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to make a contemporaneous objection to a court holding summary proceedings results in waiver of that issue upon appeal
  • holding that res judicata prohibited the trial court from reconsidering an issue decided four years earlier
  • holding that mere errors of law do not deprive a court of its jurisdiction or open its judgment to collateral attack and that such errors can only be corrected on direct appeal
  • Indiana adheres to the rule requiring a showing of prejudice before reversal may be granted; the complaining party has the burden of showing actual prejudice
  • “[W]hen a party relies on res judicata, he or she must prove that the cause of action has been fully and finally determined on the merits between the same parties by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
  • “[W]hen a party relies on res judicata, he or she must prove that the cause of action has been fully and finally deter- mined on the merits between the same parties by a court of competent jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Rucker, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.