Jairath v. Dyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could only pursue injunctive relief because a private right of action for damages does not exist under the ADA
• noting that if a substantial question of federal law forms a necessary element of a state cause of action, federal jurisdiction may be implicated
• holding no federal question existed when the plaintiff alleged that the ADA created the duty that served as the basis for the plaintiffs state law claim
• “Although a private right of action for injunctive relief does exist under the ADA, it is uncontested that there is no private right of action for damages.”
• “Although a private right of action for injunctive relief does exist under the ADA, it is uncontested that there is no private right of action for damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).