Hoepfl v. Barlow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that nothing in the ADA or its legislative history suggests an intent to allow individuals to obtain injunctions on the basis of a past injury alone
• finding plaintiff failed to establish likelihood of future harm where she had moved to a different state than defendant doctor
• finding lack of future harm where plaintiff moved to a different state
• finding lack of future harm where plaintiff moved to a different state
• finding lack of future harm where plaintiff moved to a different state
• “[T]he right created and at issue here is the right to be free from discrimination in the enjoyment of public accommodations and services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).