Colorado Court of Appeals· 7/23/2009
Jackson v. Unocal Corp.
Citations
- 231 P.3d 12
- 175 Oil & Gas Rep. 293
- 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 1315
- 2009 WL 2182603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- directing that, on remand, the trial court may, in its discretion, take additional evidence to the extent necessary because of the standards announced in the division's opinion
- “Variations in damages suffered by class members ... do not prevent class certification as a matter of law.”
- although district courts must avoid prejudging the merits of a case at the class certification stage, they may analyze the parties' substantive claims and defenses without determining whether the class will ultimately succeed in establishing each element necessary to prove its claims
- preponderance of evidence is proper burden of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webb, Graham, Gabriel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thompson v. Catlin Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2018-12-10· cited 831×
- Jackson v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-10-31· cited 26×
- Garcia v. Medved Chevrolet, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-11-12· cited 7×
- Patterson v. BP America Production Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2010-02-18· cited 4×
- Reyher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-12-24· cited 4×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,269×
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,222×
- People v. LassekColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-04-21· cited 1,047×
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 519×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2001-10-17· cited 451×
- Leonard J. Klay v. Humana, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2004-09-01· cited 388×
- Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-05-28· cited 360×
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayFirst Circuit· 2000-03-31· cited 347×
- People v. AleemSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-01-08· cited 343×
- Veronica Caridad, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSecond Circuit· 1999-07-30· cited 339×
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-08-26· cited 327×
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.First Circuit· 2006-12-05· cited 315×
- Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund v. Bombardier Inc.Second Circuit· 2008-10-14· cited 312×
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Van WykSupreme Court of Colorado· 2001-07-02· cited 310×
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Can. Export Anti. Lit.First Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 236×
- Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 219×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.