Ohio Supreme Court· 4/20/1988
Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.
Citations
- 36 Ohio St. 3d 91
- 521 N.E.2d 1091
- 1988 Ohio LEXIS 114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding decision to certify class because the record was “devoid of any evidence indicating the representatives are members of the class seeking injunctive relief’
- remanding decision to certify class because the record was \devoid of any evidence indicating the representatives are members of the class seeking injunctive relief\
- “A representative is deemed adequate so long as his interest is not antagonistic to that of the other class members.”
- “Civ.R. 23[B][2] has, as its primary application, a suit seeking injunctive relief.”
- “Civ.R. 23[B][2] has, as its primary application, a suit seeking injunctive relief.”
- “The Rule 23(B)(3) action is the so-called ‘damage’ action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Second, Sweeney, Wilson, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-10· cited 249×
- Planned Parenthood Asss'n v. Project JerichoOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-20· cited 136×
- Cullen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-05· cited 90×
- In re WhitakerOhio Supreme Court· 1988-05-04· cited 86×
- State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-01· cited 81×
- Hamilton v. Ohio Sav. BankOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-10· cited 78×
- Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of OhioOhio Supreme Court· 2013-07-16· cited 71×
- Vaccariello v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-03-06· cited 70×
- Chance v. BP Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-10-30· cited 66×
- In re Consolidated Mortgage Satisfaction CasesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-18· cited 56×
- Lycan v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-02-09· cited 51×
- In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction CasesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-18· cited 50×
- Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-08-27· cited 46×
- Koch v. RistOhio Supreme Court· 2000-07-12· cited 46×
- Wilson v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-11-17· cited 37×
- Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of OhioOhio Supreme Court· 2010-03-24· cited 31×
- Jackson v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-10-31· cited 26×
- Howland v. Purdue Pharma L.P.Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-12-15· cited 23×
- Miranda v. Saratoga DiagnosticsOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-14· cited 18×
- State v. CECOS International, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-08-03· cited 17×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 213×
- Jones v. DiamondFifth Circuit· 1975-09-26· cited 186×
- Ojalvo v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court· 1984-08-01· cited 160×
- 25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1750, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,876 Martha Frances Franks, Martha Ann Thweatt, Plaintiffs-Movant v. The Kroger CompanySixth Circuit· 1981-06-29· cited 61×
- Unnamed caseSeventh Circuit· 1973-12-21· cited 50×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.