Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 342 P.3d 1254
  • 2014 Alas. App. LEXIS 187
  • 2014 WL 7338507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the remedy of reindictment is no longer available once trial has commenced
  • applying either/or rule, and holding the failure to properly instruct the jury is a constitutional violation
  • applying either/or rule, and holding the failure to properly instruct the jury is a constitutional violation
  • applying either/or rule, and holding the failure to properly instruct the jury is a constitutional violation
  • prejudice existed because defense clearly differentiated between vaginal and anal penetration, asserting that one was consensual and one was accidental
  • prejudice existed because defense clearly differentiated between vaginal and anal penetration, asserting that one was consensual and one was accidental

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allard, Hanley, Mannheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.