United States v. Lawrence W. Lloyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “only unfair prejudice factors into the Rule 403 analysis”
• noting that concern about the jury unanimously finding the defendant guilty of a specific offense was not dispensed with because the “district court did not explicitly direct the jury that unanimity on either the use or possession offense was necessary to a guilty verdict”
• “[T]he only aspect of deliberations a juror may testify about is whether deliberations were influenced by extraneous influence or information.”
• emotions of robbery victims evidenced in voices on tape insufficient to create danger of unfair prejudice
• “Where an indictment goes unchallenged until appeal, . . . a conviction must not be reversed unless the indictment cannot be reasonably construed to charge a crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).