Skip to main content
· 9/11/1991

Heidel v. State

Citations

  • 587 So. 2d 835
  • 1991 WL 178405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • error to exclude evidence that victim wielded butcher knife two weeks prior to killing when defendant claiming self-defense and evidence relevant to show state of mind
  • clarifying Jenkins as to its Rule 403 and 404(b) holding
  • “Before a party may secure appellate reversal on an evidentiary exclusion, that party must have placed in the record the substance of the evidence he would have offered had the court ruled otherwise.”
  • clarifying Jenkins as to its Rule 403 and 404(b) holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Robertson and Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.