Kevin Allen Big Pond v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that cumulative error requires more than one error
• setting out the cumulative-error SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) I94Th e.
• because evidence was not overwhelming, cumulative effect of errors which were not egregious standing alone warranted reversal of sexual assault conviction
• because the evidence was not overwhelming, cumulative effect of errors which were not egregious standing alone warranted reversal of sexual assault conviction
• because the evidence was not overwhelming, cumulative effect of errors which were not egregious standing alone warranted reversal of sexual assault conviction
• when deciding whether an error is harmless or prejudicial, the following considerations are relevant: “whether the issue of innocence or guilt is close, the quantity and character of the error, and the gravity of the crime charged”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).