Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 859 S.E.2d 46
  • 311 Ga. 626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not abuse 18 its discretion when it allowed hearsay testimony as an excited utterance from a witness who was inside a house at the time of a shooting and heard, but did not physically see, the shooting
  • “[I]f there is any direct evidence presented by the State, the circumstantial evidence statute does not apply to a sufficiency analysis.”
  • circumstantial evidence sufficient when witnesses saw appellant with handgun near scene of shooting, saw appellant and victim fighting, and saw car similar to that owned by appellant speeding away immediately after shooting
  • “[I]f there is any direct evidence presented by the State, the circumstantial evidence statute does not apply to a sufficiency manifested by external circumstances capable of proof.” OCGA § 16-5-1 (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.