Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/3/1982

Jackson v. Hayakawa

Citations

  • 682 F.2d 1344
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “{nJeither actual notice . .. nor simply naming the person in the caption of the complaint . . . will subject defendant[] to personal jurisdiction if service was not made in substantial compliance with Rule 4”
  • holding that voluntary appearance can waive lack of personal jurisdiction
  • holding that a responsive pleading was a general appearance
  • the California State Colleges and Universities are state agencies and enjoy immunity under the Eleventh Amendment
  • “Defendants must 7 be served in accordance with Rule 4[] . . . or there is no personal jurisdiction.”
  • “Defendants must be served in accordance with 24 Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or there is no personal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jackson v. Hayakawa

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.