Trista Stanley, an Individual v. Trustees of the California State University California State University, Sacramento

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Trustees of California State University “are an arm of the state that can properly lay claim to sovereign immunity”
• holding that such “claims are subject to the applicable state statute of 24 limitations for personal injury actions”
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1367, the supplemental 20 jurisdiction statute, “does not abrogate state sovereign immunity for supplemental state law claims”
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1367, the 21 supplemental jurisdiction statute, “does not abrogate state sovereign immunity for supplemental state 22 law claims”
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1367, the supplemental jurisdiction statute, “does not abrogate state sovereign immunity for supplemental state law 23 claims”
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1367, the supplemental 7 jurisdiction statute, “does not abrogate state sovereign immunity for supplemental state law claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).