Jackson v. Danberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he numerosity requirement has been relaxed in cases like this where injunctive and declaratory relief is sought by the class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. Danberg
  Third Circuit· 2011-09-07· cited 84×
• Foltz v. Delaware State University
  D. Delaware· 2010-07-12· cited 6×
• Hinton v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2021-09-30
• Oztimurlenk, R.N. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2022-10-20

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
• General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
• Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
• In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices Litigation
  Third Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 840×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 621×
• Baby Neal v. Casey
  Third Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 562×
• Eisenberg v. Gagnon
  Third Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
• Weiss v. York Hospital
  Third Circuit· 1984-09-27· cited 140×
• In re Warfarin Sodium Antitrust Litigation
  D. Delaware· 2002-08-30· cited 47×
• In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P. & ML-Lee Acquisition Fund (Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. Securities Litigation
  D. Delaware· 1994-03-31· cited 42×
• Manning v. Princeton Consumer Discount Co., Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-01-31· cited 31×
• Grant v. Sullivan
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-02-21· cited 23×
• Tracinda Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler AG
  D. Delaware· 2003-10-28· cited 16×