Jack v. Jack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this Court may determine whether there is an established custodial environment when the record contains sufficient information for this Court to make its own -3- determination by de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Foskett v. Foskett
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2001-10-19· cited 120×
• McIntosh v. McIntosh
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-02-17· cited 115×
• Rittershaus v. Rittershaus
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-30· cited 82×
• Shulick v. Richards
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-14· cited 77×
• Brausch v. Brausch
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-04-14· cited 44×
• In Re AP
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-05-05· cited 33×
• Bridget Lee Bofysil v. Sarah Lynne Bofysil
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2021-07-09
• Leon Stoudemire v. April Thomas
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2022-10-27
• Meghan Marie Kuebler v. Paul Andrew Kuebler
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2023-05-11

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Phinney v. Perlmutter
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-06-16· cited 160×
• People v. Fetterley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-10-07· cited 147×
• Thames v. Thames
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-09-16· cited 73×
• Bowers v. Bowers
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-06-18· cited 44×
• Duperon v. Duperon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-02-21· cited 16×
• Nielsen v. Nielsen
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-10-05· cited 9×
• DeVries v. DeVries
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-09-21· cited 8×
• Petoskey v. Kotas
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-12-03· cited 7×
• Baluch v. Baluch
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-06-28· cited 3×