Ivy J. Carter v. Jon E. Litscher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issues presented to state court may differ from those presented to federal court but still toll the statute of limitations
• “Austin reads the word ‘judgment’ out of § 2244(d)(2) and tolls the time only while a particular ‘claim’ (which Austin took to mean ‘theory of relief’) is before the state court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).