Ithaca Gun Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• specifications defective in contract for production of firearms because interferences occurred when the distance between stock prongs was at one end of permitted tolerances and distance between receiver holes was at other end of permitted tolerances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• WRB Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1968-04-19· cited 123×
• Jefferson Construction Company v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1968-04-19· cited 23×
• R.E.D.M. Corporation v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1970-07-15· cited 22×
• Department of Natural Resources & Conservation v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1983-03-14· cited 18×
• AAB Joint Venture v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-02-02· cited 15×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1963-02-06· cited 138×
• Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1964-10-16· cited 121×
• Laburnum Construction Corporation v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1963-12-13· cited 87×
• F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1955-04-05· cited 78×
• Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1963-02-06· cited 58×
• Warren Bros. Roads Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1952-07-15· cited 36×
• Commerce International Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1964-10-16· cited 25×
• Railroad Waterproofing Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1956-01-31· cited 21×
• Harvey-Whipple, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1965-03-12· cited 12×
• Steel Products Engineering Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1931-02-09· cited 10×