Irish v. Irish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the domestic relations exception covers attempts to determine or modify not only alimony awards but also the division of marital property pursuant to a divorce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Lisa Crain v. Shirley Crain
  Eighth Circuit· 2023-06-23· cited 11×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burford v. Sun Oil Co.
  Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 2,418×
• Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. Richards
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,297×
• Marshall v. Marshall
  Supreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 695×
• Sherrer v. Sherrer
  Supreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 488×
• Skwira v. United States
  First Circuit· 2003-09-15· cited 167×
• Caroline Chevalier v. Kimberly Barnhart
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-10-01· cited 133×
• Annette B. Demauro v. Joseph M. Demauro, Edward Martin, Demauro Co., Inc., Nicholas Demauro, Tri-Area Development Co., Inc. And Joan Martin
  First Circuit· 1997-06-11· cited 85×
• Russell A. Firestone, III and Myrna Odell Firestone v. The Cleveland Trust Company and Russell A. Firestone, Jr., Defendants
  Sixth Circuit· 1981-07-30· cited 78×
• Sarah Fitzpatrick Mandel v. Town of Orleans
  First Circuit· 2003-04-15· cited 57×
• Corrinne Sutter v. Percy M. Pitts, III
  First Circuit· 1981-02-11· cited 43×
• Michael Wallace v. Claire Wallace
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-11-20· cited 43×
• Kimberly G. McLaughlin v. James Cotner
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-09-30· cited 36×
• Dunn v. Cometa
  First Circuit· 2001-01-26· cited 18×
• Hannah Gonzalez Canevero v. Richard Rexach, Etc.
  First Circuit· 1986-06-16· cited 13×
• Carpenter v. Carpenter
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-02-25· cited 12×
• Saltmarsh v. Saltmarsh
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-07-12· cited 7×
• Mann v. Taft
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-06· cited 6×
• Mooney v. Mooney
  First Circuit· 2006-12-22· cited 5×