First Circuit· 12/22/2006
Mooney v. Mooney
Citations
- 471 F.3d 246
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31511
- 2006 WL 3759326
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Supreme Court in Marshall also emphasized the narrow scope of the domestic relations exception
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Siler, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,343×
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 2,418×
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,297×
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 695×
- Miles v. Beneficial Massachusetts, Inc.First Circuit· 2006-02-07· cited 14×
- Hannah Gonzalez Canevero v. Richard Rexach, Etc.First Circuit· 1986-06-16· cited 13×
- Scholz v. ScholzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-03-12· cited 9×
- Mansur v. ClarkMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-04-15· cited 8×
- Saltmarsh v. SaltmarshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-07-12· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.