Annette B. Demauro v. Joseph M. Demauro, Edward Martin, Demauro Co., Inc., Nicholas Demauro, Tri-Area Development Co., Inc. And Joan Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding possible interference that a federal RICO action might cause to state divorce court’s decision as to how to divide property in a divorce proceeding was a plausible basis for abstention; Mindy’s Cosmetics, Inc. v. Dakar, 2009 WL 10669480 (C.D. Cal. 2009
• \There is plainly a case or controversy under Article III; but the statutory precondition of injury to business or property must also be met.\
• “There is plainly a case or controversy under Article III; but the statutory precondition of injury to business or property must also be met.”
• \[A]bstention by use of a stay may be permissible where a RICO action is directed against concealment or transfer of property that is the very subject of a pending divorce proceeding\
• “[A]bstention by use of a stay may be permissible where a RICO action is directed against concealment or transfer of property that is the very subject of a pending divorce proceeding.”
• \[A]bstention by use of a stay may be permissible where a RICO action is directed against concealment or transfer of property that is the very subject of a pending divorce proceeding\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).