Norpin Manufacturing Co. v. CTS Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “nine-month limitations period” was inapplicable, because the defendants failed to properly incorporate such a requirement in the bill of lading.
• “[T]he [Carmack Amendment] makes clear that nine months is a minimum and not necessarily a required time frame.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).