InstyBit, Inc. v. Poly-Tech Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[c]onceptual distinctiveness is analyzed to determine whether a plaintiff’s mark is strong enough to merit trademark protection”
• stating that trade dress is protected only when it is primarily nonfunctional
• finding favorable reviews in special-interest magazines and survey evidence demonstrated the strength of plaintiffs trade dress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).