W.D. Wisconsin· 12/16/1998
Insolia v. Philip Morris Inc.
Citations
- 186 F.R.D. 535
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21907
- 1998 WL 1045663
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relating the wealth of evidence against tobacco manufacturers and industry trade groups with respect to the potential harmful effects of tobacco usage and the addictive qualities of nicotine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crabb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 367×
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-05-16· cited 212×
- Liggett Group, Inc. v. EngleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-21· cited 77×
- Clay v. American Tobacco Co.S.D. Illinois· 1999-07-09· cited 77×
- Thompson v. American Tobacco Co.D. Minnesota· 1999-11-22· cited 56×
- Blihovde v. St. Croix CountyW.D. Wisconsin· 2003-02-13· cited 42×
- Vigus v. Southern Illinois Riverboat/Casino Cruises, Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2011-03-11· cited 14×
- Estate of Mahoney v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.S.D. Iowa· 2001-10-15· cited 12×
- Gevedon v. PharmaE.D. Kentucky· 2002-10-17· cited 10×
- Derrick J. Hammetter v. Verisma Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2021-07-30· cited 9×
- Schilling v. PGA Inc.W.D. Wisconsin· 2018-03-14· cited 6×
- Rader v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc.D. Nevada· 2011-10-05· cited 4×
- Marshall v. H & R Block Tax Services Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2010-09-17· cited 1×
- Johnson v. ITS Financial LLCS.D. Ohio· 2015-07-06· cited 1×
- In Re SmileDirectClub, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2022-03-18
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyFifth Circuit· 1996-05-23· cited 871×
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1998-01-07· cited 738×
- In Re \Agent Orange\ Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Second Circuit· 1987-04-21· cited 411×
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsSeventh Circuit· 1983-09-19· cited 404×
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1995-04-27· cited 358×
- Karen L. Keele, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Norman Paul Wexler, Mitchell Wexler and Wexler and WexlerSeventh Circuit· 1998-07-06· cited 347×
- Rosario v. LivaditisSeventh Circuit· 1992-05-13· cited 340×
- Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1997-03-17· cited 323×
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationSeventh Circuit· 1981-10-07· cited 307×
- Marcial v. Coronet Insurance CompanySeventh Circuit· 1989-07-26· cited 119×
- Joseph C. Valentino v. Michael J. Howlett, Secretary of StateSeventh Circuit· 1976-02-05· cited 105×
- Doe v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceE.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-01-09· cited 81×
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1562, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8578 Ronald Vergara v. Robert E. Hampton, Chairman of the United States Civil Service CommissionSeventh Circuit· 1978-08-24· cited 58×
- Augustine v. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rithWisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 54×
- Onderdonk v. LambWisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-07-01· cited 50×
- Arenson v. Whitehall Convalescent & Nursing Home, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1996-02-28· cited 48×
- Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.W.D. Missouri· 1997-05-22· cited 48×
Other cases named Insolia v. Philip Morris Inc.
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.