Skip to main content

Ingram v. State

Citations

  • 317 Ga. App. 606
  • 732 S.E.2d 456
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2823
  • 2012 WL 4017373
  • 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial counsel was not ineffective for deciding against requesting a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense in order to pursue an all-or-nothing defense
  • holding that because the defendant kicked officers, it was not ineffective assistance of counsel to pursue an “all or nothing” defense
  • concluding that ineffectiveness claim was properly rejected, where trial counsel made reasonable decision to pursue an all-or-nothing defense strategy based upon his review of the evidence
  • concluding that ineffectiveness claim was properly rejected, where trial counsel made reasonable decision to pursue an all-or-nothing defense strategy based upon his review of the evidence
  • applying rule in Stonaker and plain error “to the extent we are required to evaluate . . . plain error”
  • applying both a Stonaker progeny and plain-error review “to the extent we are required to evaluate whether plain error resulted from the trial court’s failure to charge on the lesser included offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.