Skip to main content

Ingram v. State

Citations

  • 601 S.E.2d 736
  • 268 Ga. App. 149
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2311
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the State’s argument that one could both steal something and retain the stolen good because that “would require concluding that the legislature intended to create a second crime that would apply to all defendants charged with theft”
  • specifically rejecting argument that the theft by taking and theft by receiving offenses are not mutually exclusive if a defendant was convicted of retaining stolen goods
  • theft by taking and theft by retaining stolen property are mutually exclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Ruffin, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.