Skip to main content

Dumas v. State

Citations

  • 471 S.E.2d 508
  • 266 Ga. 797
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2276
  • 1996 Ga. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • verdicts are mutually exclusive where it is “both legally and logically impossible to convict [the accused] of both counts”
  • trial court acted correctly by requiring jury to resume deliberations after a mutually exclusive verdict was returned
  • trial court refused on its own motion to accept verdicts finding defendant guilty of intentional and unintentional homicide
  • trial court refused on its own motion to accept verdicts finding defendant guilty of intentional and unintentional homicide
  • verdicts are mutually exclusive where it is \both legally and logically impossible to convict [the accused] of both counts\
  • trial court acted correctly by requiring jury to resume deliberations after a mutually exclusive verdict was returned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.