Skip to main content

Middleton v. State

Citations

  • 846 S.E.2d 73
  • 309 Ga. 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that “courts generally should avoid a 2 [statutory] construction that makes some language mere surplusage”
  • noting that “a motion for new trial is a proper proceeding for challenging a void criminal judgment”
  • It is “a core principle of statutory interpretation that changes in statutory language generally indicate an intent to change the meaning of the statute.”
  • it is “a core principle of statutory interpretation that changes in statutory language generally indicate an intent to change the meaning of the statute” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “[C]ourts generally should avoid a construction that makes some statutory language mere surplusage.”
  • discussing statutory requirement of knowledge that property was stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.