Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 1/7/2016

In re Zinc Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 155 F. Supp. 3d 337
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1650
  • 2016 WL 93864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Existing case law makes clear that a hub-and-spoke theory is cognizable under Section 1 only if there are both vertical agreements between the hub and each spoke, and also a horizontal agreement among the various spokes with each other.”
  • “Mere generalizations as to any particular defendant--or even defendants as a group--are insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrest

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.