Skip to main content
D. Nevada· 6/1/2015

In re Zappos.com, Inc.

Citations

  • 108 F. Supp. 3d 949
  • 2015 WL 10892034
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the majority of courts dealing with data-breach cases post-Clapper have held that absent allegations of actual identity theft or other fraud, the increased risk of such harm alone is insufficient to satisfy Article III standing
  • finding no standing where last four digits of customers’ credit card were stolen, but plaintiffs had not alleged any unauthorized purchases or other misuse
  • “Even if Plaintiffs adequately allege a loss of privacy, they have failed to show how that loss amounts to a concrete and particularized injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.