D. Nevada· 6/1/2015
In re Zappos.com, Inc.
Citations
- 108 F. Supp. 3d 949
- 2015 WL 10892034
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the majority of courts dealing with data-breach cases post-Clapper have held that absent allegations of actual identity theft or other fraud, the increased risk of such harm alone is insufficient to satisfy Article III standing
- finding no standing where last four digits of customers’ credit card were stolen, but plaintiffs had not alleged any unauthorized purchases or other misuse
- “Even if Plaintiffs adequately allege a loss of privacy, they have failed to show how that loss amounts to a concrete and particularized injury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Richard Beck v. Robert McDonaldFourth Circuit· 2017-02-06· cited 353×
- Stevens v. Zappos.com., Inc. (In re Zappos.com., Inc.)Ninth Circuit· 2018-03-08· cited 124×
- Welborn v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2016-11-02· cited 30×
- Chambliss v. CareFirst, Inc.D. Maryland· 2016-05-27· cited 27×
- Khan v. Children's National Health SystemD. Maryland· 2016-05-19· cited 25×
- Fero v. Excellus Health Plain, Inc.W.D. New York· 2017-02-22· cited 24×
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.District of Columbia· 2016-08-10· cited 8×
- Fernandez v. Leidos, Inc.E.D. California· 2015-08-27· cited 7×
- Whalen v. Michael Stores Inc.E.D. New York· 2015-12-28· cited 7×
- Torres v. Wendy's Co.M.D. Florida· 2016-07-15· cited 7×
- Theresa Stevens v. zappos.com., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2018-03-08· cited 4×
- Theresa Stevens v. zappos.com., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2018-04-20
- Abernathy v. Brandywine Urology Consultants, P.A.Superior Court of Delaware· 2021-01-21
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court· 1974-01-15· cited 3,578×
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court· 2013-02-26· cited 3,172×
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 2,256×
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerNinth Circuit· 2004-07-01· cited 1,884×
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court· 2010-06-21· cited 922×
- Love v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1989-04-06· cited 607×
- Susan B. Anthony List v. DriehausSupreme Court· 2014-06-16· cited 584×
- Krottner v. Starbucks Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2010-12-14· cited 135×
- Ronald O. Nelsen Michael Bullene v. King CountyNinth Circuit· 1990-02-09· cited 113×
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationS.D. California· 2014-01-21· cited 82×
- In Re: Science Applications International Corp. (Saic) Backup Tape Data Theft LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-09· cited 66×
- In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Privacy LitigationN.D. California· 2014-09-04· cited 64×
- Storm v. Paytime, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-03-13· cited 18×
- Galaria v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceS.D. Ohio· 2014-02-10· cited 13×
- Peters v. St. Joseph Services Corp.S.D. Texas· 2015-02-11· cited 12×
- Wright v. Incline Village General Improvement DistrictD. Nevada· 2009-02-09· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.