Fernandez v. Leidos, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding attempts to open bank accounts and access plaintiff’s email not fairly traceable to data breach because stolen data tapes didn’t include bank account information and email addresses
• finding, where plaintiff waited three years post-breach to file suit, that plaintiff had not alleged imminent risk of fraud
• finding no traceability when the plaintiff did not allege that the medical conditions targeted by increased spam mailings were listed in the medical records compromised in the breach
• “Plaintiff has not shown there is a substantial risk that his PII/PHI will be imminently 10 misused ‘in light of the attenuated chain of inferences necessary to find harm here.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Welborn v. Internal Revenue Service
  District of Columbia· 2016-11-02· cited 30×
• Moore v. Centrelake Medical Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-09-16

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
• Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 12,961×
• O'Shea v. Littleton
  Supreme Court· 1974-01-15· cited 3,578×
• Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
  Supreme Court· 2013-02-26· cited 3,172×
• Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-07-01· cited 1,884×
• Raines v. Byrd
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,682×
• Douglas Leite v. Crane Company
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-04-25· cited 1,107×
• Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
  Supreme Court· 2014-06-16· cited 584×
• In Re: Science Applications International Corp. (Saic) Backup Tape Data Theft Litigation
  District of Columbia· 2014-05-09· cited 66×
• Montana Environmental Information Center v. Stone-Manning
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-09-11· cited 39×
• In re Zappos.com, Inc.
  D. Nevada· 2015-06-01· cited 25×