Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/30/2011
In re W.Z.
Citations
- 194 Ohio App. 3d 610
- 957 N.E.2d 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that fundamental fairness requires a hearing to determine whether a juvenile sex offender has been rehabilitated before he may be subjected to registration and community notification where statute was based solely on the offense committed
- concluding that fundamental fairness requires a hearing to determine whether a juvenile sex offender has been rehabilitated before he may be subjected to registration and community notification where statute was based solely on the offense committed
- no rational basis for automatic registration of juvenile sex offenders at time of adjudication where, pursuant to state law, court made a determination as to rehabilitation when juvenile turned 21
- community notification “obscures the foundational principles upon which the juvenile justice system was built”
- no rational basis for automatic registration of juvenile sex offenders at time of adjudication where, pursuant to state law, court made a determination as to rehabilitation when juvenile turned 21
- community notification \obscures the foundational principles upon which the juvenile justice system was built\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Handwork, Pietrykowski, Singer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 63×
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 2013-07-25· cited 52×
- In re C.L.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-08· cited 2×
- In re N.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-17· cited 2×
- State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.)Nevada Supreme Court· 2013-07-25
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 2,975×
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 2,289×
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 2,038×
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1998-09-30· cited 1,648×
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 1,492×
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
- Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 833×
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 785×
- State v. EppingerOhio Supreme Court· 2001-03-28· cited 734×
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-05· cited 731×
- Thompson v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 617×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2000-04-28· cited 556×
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 487×
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 452×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.