District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/20/2005
In re Wright
Citations
- 885 A.2d 315
- 2005 WL 2665437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- one-year suspension with fitness when respondent's actions demonstrated a pattern of dishonesty and neglect and a lack of responsibility to clients
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glickman, Newman, Terry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-03-28· cited 49×
- In Re DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-13· cited 23×
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-09-01· cited 14×
- In Re FlynnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-09-24
- In re Kenneth A. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-02-13
- In re Kenneth A. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23
- In re Warner Anthony, Jr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-12-13
- In re Mazingo-MayronneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-06-09
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-13· cited 84×
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-01-29· cited 58×
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-09-26· cited 58×
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-08-06· cited 37×
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-07-25· cited 34×
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-18· cited 29×
- Matter of FogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-08-01· cited 29×
- In Re ChisholmDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-03· cited 26×
- In Re O'DonnellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-11-26· cited 17×
- In Re ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-07-06· cited 16×
- In re WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-05-04· cited 13×
- In Re TinsleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-12-03· cited 12×
- In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-08-05· cited 12×
- In Re HuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-03-19· cited 10×
- In Re GrimesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.