Sixth Circuit· 12/29/2008
Carroll v. Sanders
Citations
- 551 F.3d 397
- 60 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1692
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26421
- 2008 WL 5386525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although not an ‘absolute’ imperative, the ‘rule of last antecedent’ creates at least a rough presumption that such qualifying phrases attach only to the nearest available target.”
- using the last antecedent rule to interpret a statutory provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilman, Sutton, Kethledge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationSixth Circuit· 2016-03-22· cited 187×
- Todd Moats v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Sixth Circuit· 2022-07-27· cited 123×
- Sobitan v. GludSeventh Circuit· 2009-12-09· cited 42×
- Engleson v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSixth Circuit· 2013-07-03· cited 34×
- Maple Drive Farms Ltd. Partnership v. VilsackSixth Circuit· 2015-04-01· cited 12×
- Keaton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-07-14· cited 11×
- In Re HieterD. Idaho· 2009-03-13· cited 10×
- United States v. Bryon TaylorSixth Circuit· 2014-04-18· cited 10×
- United States v. James D. PaulsonNinth Circuit· 2023-05-17· cited 9×
- Lindskog v. M & I BankE.D. Wisconsin· 2012-10-02· cited 5×
- In Re ColbourneM.D. Florida· 2010-11-10· cited 3×
- In re OhakpoE.D. Michigan· 2013-03-04· cited 2×
- Goldberg v. Companion Life InsuranceM.D. Florida· 2012-12-19· cited 2×
- Barbara Fakhouri v. Ober Gatlinburg, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2016-04-21· cited 1×
- Babajide Sobitan v. Lori GludSeventh Circuit· 2009-12-09
- In re JohnsonD. Massachusetts· 2013-03-11
- In re KleinW.D. Texas· 2016-01-29
- Sharenne TuckerSixth Circuit· 2026-03-30
- Conyers v. KBRFifth Circuit· 2026-05-07
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 3,700×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 2,717×
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court· 2003-11-12· cited 1,983×
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-02-29· cited 1,398×
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court· 1991-03-19· cited 884×
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 708×
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court· 1985-06-10· cited 233×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Nextwave Personal Communications Inc.Supreme Court· 2003-01-27· cited 214×
- Rogan v. Bank One, Natl AssocSixth Circuit· 2006-08-09· cited 81×
- Branigan v. BatemanFourth Circuit· 2008-02-04· cited 51×
- In Re WilliamsD. Colorado· 2008-09-12· cited 40×
- In Re: Mark A. Sidebottom, Debtor-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 2005-12-09· cited 34×
- In Re LillyC.D. Illinois· 2007-10-30· cited 32×
- L & W Supply Corporation v. AcuitySixth Circuit· 2007-01-23· cited 23×
- McDow v. Sours (In Re Sours)E.D. Virginia· 2006-10-10· cited 22×
- Gagne v. Fessenden (Gagne)First Circuit· 2008-09-19· cited 19×
- In Re GrydzukN.D. Indiana· 2006-10-20· cited 17×
- In Re McGheeW.D. Kentucky· 2006-04-26· cited 14×
- In Re KnightonM.D. Georgia· 2006-12-19· cited 12×
- In Re PerkinsS.D. Illinois· 2007-11-21· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.