Skip to main content
D. Idaho· 4/6/1993

In Re Williams

Citations

  • 158 B.R. 488
  • 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 2040
  • 1993 WL 376617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the costs and expenses were a “claim” potentially subject to discharge
  • where the court stated that the Idaho Bar does not rely upon reimbursement awards from disciplinary proceedings for its financial vitality
  • where the court held “It would be poor policy indeed to suggest that an attorney could elude punishment for professional improprieties by resorting to the Bankruptcy Code.”
  • Idaho Bar is “governmental unit” for purposes of section 523(a)(7); Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois v. Lewis, 151 B.R. 200, 202 (Bankr.C.D.Ill.1992) (Illinois ARDC was “governmental unit” under section 523

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim D. Pappas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.