Skip to main content
· 9/19/2008

Richmond v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 913
  • 60 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1126
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20476
  • 50 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 155
  • 2008 WL 4277313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Here, the [Disciplinary Board] is not concerned with recouping its litigation costs to the degree that it is concerned with deterring unprofessional conduct.”
  • attorney discipline costs incurred by state in attorney disciplinary proceedings assessed against the debtor were excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(7
  • costs expended by professional conduct committee during the pendency of a disciplinary action against an attorney were not dischargeable because they did not constitute “an actual pecuniary loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Cudahy, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.