· 9/19/2008
Richmond v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct
Citations
- 542 F.3d 913
- 60 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1126
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20476
- 50 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 155
- 2008 WL 4277313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Here, the [Disciplinary Board] is not concerned with recouping its litigation costs to the degree that it is concerned with deterring unprofessional conduct.”
- attorney discipline costs incurred by state in attorney disciplinary proceedings assessed against the debtor were excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(7
- costs expended by professional conduct committee during the pendency of a disciplinary action against an attorney were not dischargeable because they did not constitute “an actual pecuniary loss”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Cudahy, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.