Skip to main content
· 2/5/1992

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Haberman (In Re Haberman)

Citations

  • 137 B.R. 292
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 189
  • 22 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1039
  • 1992 WL 40822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that even though assessed costs may result in reimbursement, compensation is not the primary objective of disciplining attorneys

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James E. Shapiro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.