Sixth Circuit· 8/25/1986
In Re William Mitchell Dolin, Debtor. William Mitchell Dolin v. Northern Petrochemical Company Lake River Corporation Airosol Corporation
Citations
- 799 F.2d 251
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28895
- 14 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1325
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the “general, unsubstantiated statements about [the debtor’s] lifestyle did not ‘explain satisfactorily’ the disposition of more than $500,000 in the three years preceding his bankruptcy”
- determining debtor’s “general, unsubstantiated statements” regarding his cocaine addiction and compulsive gambling insufficient to overcome § 727(a)(5) objection to discharge
- determining debtor’s “general, unsubstantiated statements” regarding his cocaine addiction and compulsive gambling insufficient to overcome § 727(a)(5) objection to discharge
- debtor’s drug and gambling addictions did not justify his difficulty in recording his business transactions
- Debtor's general unsubstantiated statements about his lifestyle did not satisfactorily explain the disposition of $500,000.
- chemical dependence 6 and compulsive gambling did not excuse the debtor’s failure to 7 keep adequate records
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy, Wellford, Boggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Peoples State Rank of Mazeppa v. Drenckhahn (In Re Drenckhahn)D. Minnesota· 1987-09-03· cited 40×
- Wazeter v. Michigan National Bank (In Re Wazeter)W.D. Michigan· 1997-06-05· cited 36×
- G & J Investments v. Zell (In Re Zell)S.D. Ohio· 1989-11-29· cited 34×
- Fokkena v. Tripp (In Re Tripp)N.D. Iowa· 1998-08-03· cited 33×
- Strzesynski v. Devaul (Devaul)N.D. Ohio· 2004-11-24· cited 32×
- Baker v. Reed (In Re Reed)N.D. Ohio· 2004-05-14· cited 31×
- CM Temporary Services, Inc. v. Bailey (In Re Bailey)S.D. Ohio· 2007-09-12· cited 30×
- Solomon v. Barman (In Re Barman)E.D. Michigan· 2000-02-14· cited 26×
- Ayers v. Babb (In Re Babb)E.D. Tennessee· 2006-12-19· cited 21×
- Saluja v. Mantra (In Re Mantra)N.D. Illinois· 2004-09-20· cited 17×
- Noland v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)S.D. Ohio· 2008-04-25· cited 15×
- Butler v. Liu (In Re Liu)N.D. Georgia· 2002-12-12· cited 13×
- Grassmann v. Brown (In re Brown)W.D. Oklahoma· 2017-06-23· cited 13×
- Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Sauntry (In Re Sauntry)E.D. Texas· 2008-02-08· cited 12×
- Lubman v. Hall (In Re Hall)E.D. Virginia· 1994-11-01· cited 11×
- Hyun Suk Cho v. Seung Chan Park (In re Seung Chan Park)D. Maryland· 2012-09-25· cited 11×
- Ernst v. Walton (In Re Walton)S.D. Ohio· 1989-06-30· cited 10×
- Gordon v. Courtney (In Re Courtney)E.D. Tennessee· 2006-09-26· cited 9×
- Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Hake (In Re Hake)N.D. Ohio· 2008-03-21· cited 9×
- McManus v. McManus (In Re McManus)E.D. Virginia· 1990-04-04· cited 8×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re UnderhillSecond Circuit· 1936-02-10· cited 179×
- In the Matter of Leland H. Baum, Bankrupt. Leland H. Baum v. Earl Millikin, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1966-04-26· cited 73×
- In the Matter of Marilyn Sliman McBee Wife Of/and Hal Dean McBee Bankrupts v. Florence Sliman and St. Landry Bank & Trust Co.Fifth Circuit· 1975-05-28· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.