Strzesynski v. Devaul (Devaul)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that section 727(a)(5) itself says nothing about written corroboration and declining to hold “that an explanation must always be supported by records to be satisfactory”
• finding justification based on debtor's limited education, dependence on others to assist him, and the disposal of the documents by a friend to whom he turned for assistance
• describing how the proper tests at step one and step two have often become \conflated and confused\
• “The list of prohibited acts is stated in the alternative: concealing, destroying, mutilating, falsifying, failing to keep or preserve.”; emphasis added
• justification for debtor’s missing recorded information included limited education and dependence on others for assistance
• justification for debtor’s missing 24 recorded information included limited education and dependence on others for assistance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).