Skip to main content
· 11/29/1989

G & J Investments v. Zell (In Re Zell)

Citations

  • 108 B.R. 615
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2631
  • 1989 WL 147788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an unsophisticated businesswoman was justified in relying on a bookkeeper to maintain books and records
  • determining that the “unless the court . . . orders otherwise” language in § 1108 “empowers a debtor-in-possession with far reaching discretion to operate its business [under § 1107], unless the Court orders otherwise”
  • finding justification where the debtor’s business office was vandalized, her records were stolen, and her computer was destroyed
  • the debtor’s business office was vandalized, her records were stolen, and her computer was destroyed
  • that debtor did not keep “most fastidious and precise business records” was excusable when debtor was relatively unsophisticated businesswoman
  • the purpose of § 727(a)(3) is to assure the trustee and creditors that they will be provided with sufficient information with which they can assess Debtor’s estate and general financial posture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.