Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 1/30/1989

In Re Watson

Citations

  • 102 B.R. 112
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2008
  • 1989 WL 83080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • motions for reconsideration are construed as motions to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e)
  • motions for reconsideration are intended to allow for the correction of manifest errors of law or fact, or for presentation of newly discovered evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.