Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 8/11/1994

In Re Walker

Citations

  • 171 B.R. 197
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1167
  • 1994 WL 424678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the 180-day bar to 25 refiling did not apply because the “the Debtor’s failure to oppose our dismissal of his case was not 26 tantamount to a voluntary dismissal” but describing the decision as a “close call”
  • not opposing a dismissal motion filed by another interested party, even where the debtor failed to timely file the requisite schedules, does not constitute a voluntary dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David A. Scholl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.