In Re King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the second prong of Section 109(g)(1) “would not be a meaningful tool ... if [debtors] could thumb them noses at their duties so long as they come into court on dates set”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-02-26· cited 363×
• In Re Herrera
  N.D. Illinois· 1996-03-28· cited 44×
• In Re Huerta
  C.D. California· 1992-02-28· cited 38×
• In Re Pike
  S.D. Ohio· 2001-02-09· cited 18×
• In Re Fleury
  D. Massachusetts· 2003-06-06· cited 17×
• In Re Spear
  D. Massachusetts· 1996-12-13· cited 12×
• In Re Walker
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-08-11· cited 10×
• In Re Jongsma
  N.D. Indiana· 2009-03-25· cited 8×
• In Re Neill
  N.D. Ohio· 1993-08-23· cited 6×
• In re Bell
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-02-03· cited 6×
• In Re Bradley
  E.D. Louisiana· 1993-03-08· cited 4×
• In re Hildreth
  N.D. Ohio· 1994-02-08· cited 3×
• In Re Howard
  E.D. Kentucky· 1991-11-19· cited 2×
• In re Nix
  W.D. Tennessee· 1998-01-29· cited 2×
• Dos Anjos v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Dos Anjos)
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-11-06· cited 2×
• In re Strongs
  E.D. North Carolina· 2017-06-13· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tinker v. Colwell
  Supreme Court· 1904-03-21· cited 541×
• United Bank of Southgate v. Nelson
  N.D. Illinois· 1983-09-25· cited 106×
• In Re Nelkovski
  N.D. Illinois· 1985-01-31· cited 45×
• In Re McKissie
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-07-27· cited 37×
• In Re Correa
  N.D. Illinois· 1986-02-25· cited 16×
• In Re Patel
  M.D. Alabama· 1985-02-14· cited 13×