District of Columbia· 9/20/2000
In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 120 F. Supp. 2d 45
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14102
- 2000 WL 1480879
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that proposing party bears the burden
- holding that proposing party bears the burden
- “Aerospatiale did not specifically rule on the burden of proof for these factors, but most courts have placed this burden on the party seeking to require first-use of the Convention.”
- discussing Belgium’s reservations to the Hague Convention
- discussing Belgium’s reservations to the Hague Convention
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas F. Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgThird Circuit· 2004-02-13· cited 75×
- In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-06-29· cited 21×
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Société Commerciale ToutélectricCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-12-17· cited 14×
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.D. New Jersey· 2009-09-24· cited 11×
- Filler v. LernoutD. Massachusetts· 2003-11-13· cited 4×
- In re Cote d'Azur Estate CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2022-11-18
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorD.C. Circuit· 1983-11-29· cited 490×
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 221×
- United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.First Circuit· 1999-09-10· cited 143×
- United States v. 51 Pieces Of Real Property, Roswell, New MexicoTenth Circuit· 1994-02-28· cited 87×
- Rich v. KIS California, Inc.M.D. North Carolina· 1988-06-22· cited 79×
- McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 1999-03-17· cited 28×
- Hudson v. Hermann Pfauter Gmbh & Co.N.D. New York· 1987-09-09· cited 16×
- Benton Graphics v. Uddeholm Corp.D. New Jersey· 1987-11-30· cited 13×
- Valois of America, Inc. v. Risdon Corp.D. Connecticut· 1997-07-23· cited 13×
- In re Perrier Bottled Water LitigationD. Connecticut· 1991-07-11· cited 12×
- Fishel v. BASF GroupS.D. Iowa· 1997-08-19· cited 9×
- Japan Halon Co. v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp.N.D. Indiana· 1993-05-28· cited 8×
- Doster v. SchenkM.D. North Carolina· 1991-12-19· cited 7×
- Bedford Computer Corp. v. Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd. (In Re Bedford Computer Corp.)D. New Hampshire· 1990-02-15· cited 6×
- Knight v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-10-09· cited 6×
- Geo-Culture, Inc. v. Siam Investment Management S.A.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-04-16· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.