Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “since the deposition is focused on the crucial threshold issue of jurisdiction, the jurisdictional deposition should be completed as soon as possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmace v. David R. Herndon
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-01-24· cited 15×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 221×
• Gerling International Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Appeal of Gerling International Insurance Co
  Third Circuit· 1988-01-29· cited 81×
• In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings Ag
  Third Circuit· 2004-02-13· cited 75×
• United States v. Vetco Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1981-05-11· cited 56×
• Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1987-07-09· cited 51×
• In re Honda American Motor Co.
  D. Maryland· 1996-08-30· cited 46×
• Alfadda v. Fenn
  S.D. New York· 1993-05-06· cited 27×
• Work v. Bier
  District of Columbia· 1985-05-02· cited 14×
• In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
  District of Columbia· 2000-09-20· cited 10×
• M & C Corp. v. Erwin Behr GmbH & Co., KG
  E.D. Michigan· 1996-02-26· cited 10×
• Roberts v. Heim
  N.D. California· 1990-03-08· cited 8×