Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 1/14/2011

In Re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation

Citations

  • 629 F.3d 741
  • 2011 WL 117108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a district judge’s unwarranted criticism of an attorney is not an appealable order
  • holding that lead counsel in a class action should receive a fee award consistent with the “the contingent fee that the class would have negotiated with the class counsel at the outset had negotiations with clients having a real stake been feasible”
  • increasing class counsel’s fee award out of re‐ lief awarded to class
  • increasing class counsel’s fee award out of re‐ lief awarded to class
  • increasing class counsel’s fee award out of re‐ lief awarded to class
  • “within the set of colorable legal claims, a higher risk of loss does argue for a higher fee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Kanne, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.