In Re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a district judge’s unwarranted criticism of an attorney is not an appealable order
• holding that lead counsel in a class action should receive a fee award consistent with the “the contingent fee that the class would have negotiated with the class counsel at the outset had negotiations with clients having a real stake been feasible”
• increasing class counsel’s fee award out of re‐ lief awarded to class
• increasing class counsel’s fee award out of re‐ lief awarded to class
• increasing class counsel’s fee award out of re‐ lief awarded to class
• “within the set of colorable legal claims, a higher risk of loss does argue for a higher fee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named In Re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation
  N.D. Illinois· 2002-09-10· cited 35×
• In Re TRANS UNION CORP. PRIVACY LITIGATION
  N.D. Illinois· 2004-07-06· cited 10×
• In Re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-01-23· cited 7×
• In Re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-12-27· cited 6×
• In re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation
  N.D. Illinois· 2008-03-31